| 1. | How can one validly infer a universal statement from any number of existential statements?
|
| 2. | Since subcontraries are negations of universal statements, they were called'particular'statements by the medieval logicians.
|
| 3. | Later scholars tend to avoid universal statements about mythology.
|
| 4. | In GB, anyone of various putative universal statements permitting a specified degree of variation within languages.
|
| 5. | My point is that the source does not characterize the meaninglessness of universal statements as a problem.
|
| 6. | :: : Be careful of universal statements.
|
| 7. | Inductivist methodology supposed that one can somehow move from a series of singular existential statements to a universal statement.
|
| 8. | The first-order predicate calculus avoids such ambiguity by using formulae that carry no existential import with respect to universal statements.
|
| 9. | :: The only relevant point on which we all agree is that " the verification principle renders universal statements meaningless ".
|
| 10. | Deprived of a " realistic " setting, the characters make a pessimistically universal statement : " True love " doesn't exist.
|
मोबाइल